<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BLFA Final: Flybe -vs- EasyJet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/</link>
	<description>How to be More Eco and shop greener</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Dunlop</title>
		<link>http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/comment-page-1/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dunlop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>I know this was posted a while ago, but I have just come across it.
I have one comment to make about your comparisons of the airline&#039;s fleets. You only compaire the age of the fleets in these posts. I think that this doesn&#039;t give flybe enough credit. They have a mixture of smaller planes which are much better for the distances of their routes. EasyJet and the others fly some longer distances and for that 737s are better, but they also fly these aircraft on shorter routes, for which they arn&#039;t as good. These larger aircraft are designed to be most efficient when cruising which at shorter distances is only a small part of the flight. Airlines need to think about what the aeroplanes are going to be used for not just their age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this was posted a while ago, but I have just come across it.<br />
I have one comment to make about your comparisons of the airline&#8217;s fleets. You only compaire the age of the fleets in these posts. I think that this doesn&#8217;t give flybe enough credit. They have a mixture of smaller planes which are much better for the distances of their routes. EasyJet and the others fly some longer distances and for that 737s are better, but they also fly these aircraft on shorter routes, for which they arn&#8217;t as good. These larger aircraft are designed to be most efficient when cruising which at shorter distances is only a small part of the flight. Airlines need to think about what the aeroplanes are going to be used for not just their age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeMoreEco &#187; BLFA Final: Flybe -vs- EasyJet</title>
		<link>http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>BeMoreEco &#187; BLFA Final: Flybe -vs- EasyJet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] BLFA Semi-Final: Monarch 1 - 4 EasyJet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BLFA Semi-Final: Monarch 1 &#8211; 4 EasyJet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getfreeinsurance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BLFA Semi-Final: Monarch -vs- EasyJet</title>
		<link>http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>getfreeinsurance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BLFA Semi-Final: Monarch -vs- EasyJet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bemoreeco.com/2008/08/28/blfa-semi-final-monarch-vs-easyjet/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by richard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by richard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
